Legal Status of DAOs: Where They Stand Around the World in 2025

Imagine a company with no CEO, no board of directors, and no office. No one owns it. No one controls it. But it holds millions in assets, signs contracts, hires contractors, and makes decisions - all through code and votes from people around the world. That’s a DAO. And in 2025, the big question isn’t whether they work - it’s whether they’re legal.

What Exactly Is a DAO?

A DAO, or Decentralized Autonomous Organization, runs on blockchain technology using smart contracts. These are self-executing programs that automatically carry out actions when certain conditions are met. Members join by buying governance tokens. Each token gives you a vote on proposals - like how to spend the treasury, who to hire, or what new features to build. Everything is public. Everything is recorded on the blockchain. No middlemen. No paperwork. Just code and consensus.

But here’s the catch: the law wasn’t built for this. Traditional companies have names, addresses, registered agents, and clear chains of responsibility. DAOs don’t. So when something goes wrong - a hack, a bad vote, a breach of contract - who do you sue? Who pays? Who’s even in charge?

Why Legal Status Matters

Without legal recognition, a DAO is just a group of people bound by code. That sounds cool until you try to open a bank account, sign a lease, or hire a lawyer. Banks won’t work with you. Insurance companies won’t cover you. Courts won’t recognize your agreements. And if someone sues your DAO, they might sue every single member - personally. That’s right. Your crypto wallet could be on the line.

This isn’t theoretical. In 2022, the CFTC sued Ooki DAO for violating derivatives trading rules. The court didn’t ask who ran it. It treated the DAO as an unincorporated association - meaning every token holder could be held liable. That scared off a lot of people. If you’re holding 0.1% of a DAO’s tokens, are you legally responsible for its actions? In most places, the answer was: yes.

Wyoming: The First Real Legal Home

Wyoming didn’t wait. In March 2024, it passed the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) law. It was the first in the U.S. to give DAOs legal personality. That means a DAO registered under DUNA can: sign contracts, own property, sue and be sued, open bank accounts, and pay taxes - just like a corporation.

But there’s a catch: it has to be nonprofit. No profit distribution to members. No dividends. No selling tokens for returns. That rules out most DeFi projects, NFT collectives, or investment DAOs. Still, it’s a breakthrough. DUNA requires at least 100 members to prevent founder-controlled shells. It also gives limited liability protection - meaning your personal assets are safe if the DAO gets sued.

Early adopters in Wyoming say it’s working. One DAO managing community grants for open-source developers registered as a DUNA and now has a bank account, a legal name, and can hire developers under contract. They call it “the first real DAO that can do business.”

New Hampshire: The Practical Approach

New Hampshire took a different path. Its DAO Act, effective July 2025, lets DAOs register as a new type of legal entity - not nonprofit, not LLC, but something entirely new. It’s called a “DAO entity.” Unlike Wyoming, profit distribution is allowed. Members can get paid. Tokens can be traded. The state is even building a public registry to list registered DAOs, their governance rules, and their smart contract addresses.

This is the first time a U.S. state has created a tailored legal structure for DAOs that fits real-world business needs. It doesn’t force nonprofits. It doesn’t require physical offices. It just says: if you follow these transparency rules, you get legal standing. The Secretary of State is still finalizing the registration system, but early feedback from blockchain startups is positive. They see it as the most balanced model so far.

Virginia, Vermont, Tennessee: The Other Contenders

Virginia is pushing legislation to let DAOs register as Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) under existing state law. That’s smart. It uses a familiar structure - you get liability protection and legal capacity without inventing a whole new category. The catch? You have to file paperwork like any other LLC, including naming a registered agent. That’s a step toward centralization, but it works.

Vermont’s approach is similar. It created the Blockchain-Based Limited Liability Company (BBLLC). It’s an LLC, but with special rules for blockchain governance. Members can vote on-chain. Minutes can be stored on the blockchain. It’s still an LLC, but optimized for crypto.

Tennessee passed a law recognizing DAOs as legal entities under its Uniform Limited Liability Company Act. It’s less detailed than Wyoming or New Hampshire, but it gives DAOs the right to operate without being automatically treated as general partnerships.

Malta: The European Model

While U.S. states are experimenting, Malta went all-in. Under its Innovative Technology Arrangements and Services (ITAS) Act, DAOs can apply for certification from the Malta Digital Innovation Authority (MDIA). Once certified, they get full legal recognition across the EU. That’s huge. A DAO based in Malta can legally operate in Germany, France, or Spain without worrying about conflicting rules.

Malta’s system is strict. You need to submit your smart contracts, governance rules, and a detailed risk assessment. You must appoint a resident agent - someone physically in Malta who can receive legal notices. Some in the crypto community hate that. “It’s not decentralized if you need a person in Valletta,” they say. But for institutions - hedge funds, asset managers, venture firms - Malta is the only place in Europe where they can legally invest in a DAO.

The Big Trade-Offs

There’s no perfect model. Each jurisdiction forces a compromise:

• Wyoming: Strong liability protection, but no profits allowed.
• New Hampshire: Lets you make money, but registration is still being built.
• Virginia/Vermont: Uses existing LLC rules - easy to understand, but less flexible.
• Malta: EU-wide access, but requires a physical presence and heavy compliance.

If you’re running a community charity DAO, Wyoming’s DUNA might be perfect. If you’re building a DeFi protocol that pays out fees to token holders, New Hampshire is your best bet. If you need to operate in Europe, Malta is the only option - for now.

What About the Rest of the World?

Most countries still treat DAOs as legal gray zones. In the UK, Australia, and Canada, there’s no specific law. DAOs operate under general contract or partnership rules - meaning members are personally liable. In Singapore, regulators are watching closely but haven’t issued formal guidance. Japan allows DAOs to register as corporations, but only if they meet strict corporate governance standards.

China bans them outright. Russia has no clear position but has cracked down on crypto exchanges. Brazil and India are exploring regulatory sandboxes. The global picture is messy. That’s why many DAOs are choosing U.S. or Maltese registration - not because they’re based there, but because those places give them legal cover.

What Should You Do?

If you’re starting or joining a DAO in 2025, here’s what to ask:

1. Do you plan to make money? If yes, avoid Wyoming’s DUNA.
2. Do you need to bank, sign contracts, or hire employees? Then you need legal status - don’t rely on code alone.
3. Are your members mostly in the U.S.? New Hampshire or Wyoming are your top choices.
4. Do you want to operate in Europe? Malta is your only real option.
5. Are you okay with giving up full decentralization? Then pick a jurisdiction that requires a registered agent or physical address.

Don’t assume “code is law.” In court, it’s not. The law still says: if you’re in charge, you’re responsible. Even if you’re just holding tokens.

The Future Is Still Being Written

The U.S. federal government hasn’t weighed in yet. The SEC hasn’t classified DAO tokens as securities. The IRS hasn’t clarified how to tax DAO distributions. The CFTC is still chasing unregistered ones. Until federal rules come, states and countries will keep competing.

That’s actually good. Competition drives better laws. New Hampshire didn’t copy Wyoming. It improved on it. Virginia didn’t ignore DAOs - it adapted LLC law. That’s how innovation works.

DAOs aren’t going away. They’re too efficient, too transparent, too powerful. The question isn’t whether they’ll survive. It’s whether the law will catch up - and fast enough to protect both the builders and the users.